Jason OMahony - Irish political blogger, Irish politics, EU politics
 

Freedom Christians Vs. Bin Laden Christians.

Posted by Jason O on Mar 10, 2010 in US Politics |

crossSome years ago, a senior figure in the Democratic Unionist Party expessed his distaste for homosexuality, and was savaged by the liberal media. I remember thinking at the time that he was being unfairly treated (for that particular remark) because I didn’t see the problem. If a gay man had expressed his distaste for the heterosexual lifestyle, would we be outraged? Should we be? Of course not, because there is a line here that needs to be recognised. People should be free to say “that’s not for me” as opposed to the more extreme “that’s not for me, and I’m not going to let it be for you either!”

That’s the debate that American Christians need to be having. I have no time for those who say that churches should be forced to recognise same-sex marriages, because being a member of a religion is a free choice, whereas being bound by US law is not, if you live in the US. As a result, Christians should have a right to say that homosexuality is not their thing, but respect that their religious beliefs are their own and should not be forced on others. These are what I call “Freedom Christian” and they should be respected. The problem is that in the US Christian opinion seems to be dominated by what I call “Bin Laden Christians” who believe, like the terrorist leader, that they have the right to force their beliefs on others. Not only do they not want the right of same-sex marriage, they don’t want anyone else to have it either, which is the exact same position Bin Laden takes.

Bin Laden Christians are unAmerican Christians, and it’s time that Freedom Christians stand up to them.

3 Comments

Daniel Sullivan
Mar 10, 2010 at 10:45 am

Wasn’t there a preacher, from the evangelical tradition of some prominence in the last election cycle in the US who meet with Obama and McCain who rather than focusing solely on abortion was raising issues of climate change and global poverty? So there is some movement in this area, but it needs to be more.


 
Jason O
Mar 10, 2010 at 2:29 pm

He spoke at Pres. Obama’s inauguration, where he was attacked by gay rights advocates. In fairness, some of the people on the side I am on (pro-gay rights) are their own worst enemies. Some of our own people cannot accept that there are those who will not agree with one’s lifestyle but will defend the right to live it.


 
Daniel Sullivan
Mar 12, 2010 at 7:31 pm

I think it is odd that some people don’t understand the difference between criticism of lifestyle and sexuality. Criticising some people for riding all round them without any thoughts to the consequences whether they’re gay or straight is actually quite reasonable. While seeking to deny some citizens access to some state services or legal provsions based on their sexuality isn’t.

And apparently,David Quinn is now writing in the Indo promising us a reign of toads or the earth being struck by a meteor if the civil union legislation is passed.


 

Reply

Copyright © 2017 Jason O Mahony All rights reserved. Email: Jason@JasonOMahony.ie.